On 27 February 2018 at 12:39, Kip Warner <kip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 17:31 -0800, Nathan Anderson wrote:
>> Is one end or the other behind a NAT of some kind?
>
> Both are behind NATs. I've heard this can have something to do with
> MTUs, but not sure.
That's true. The problem is the combination of paths with differing
MTUs and devices (which can include NAT devices) that do not pass IP
fragments. This will show up in the non-decreasing Send-Q I described
earlier.
--
Darren Tucker (dtucker at dtucker.net)
GPG key 11EAA6FA / A86E 3E07 5B19 5880 E860 37F4 9357 ECEF 11EA A6FA (new)
Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience
usually comes from bad judgement.
_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
