Re: DH Group Exchange Fallback

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

 



I see.

Yes, using explicitly disabled algorithms is a very surprising behavior.
    - Tim.

On 9/23/17, 10:32 AM, "Joseph S Testa II" <jtesta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    On 09/22/2017 06:55 PM, Tim Broberg wrote:
    > Do I understand correctly, that you find the security of group 14 unacceptable and yet you left it enabled?
    
    In the end, I'm trying to ensure a minimum equivalent of 128-bits of 
    security.  Group14 is 2048-bits, which roughly translates to 112-bits. [1]
    
    To this end, I disabled the "diffie-hellman-group14-sha1" and 
    "diffie-hellman-group14-sha256" kex algorithms, but the problem is that 
    the group exchange "diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256" is not 
    respecting the admin's wishes, and falls back to group14, even when 
    specifically told not to (by the admin removing 2048-bit groups in 
    /etc/ssh/moduli).
    
    There's currently no way to ensure 100% that 2048-bit DH is disabled.
    
        - Joe
    
    
    [1] See NIST Special Publication 800-57, Part 1, Revision 4, p. 53, 
    <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__nvlpubs.nist.gov_nistpubs_SpecialPublications_NIST.SP.800-2D57pt1r4.pdf&d=DwICaQ&c=Zok6nrOF6Fe0JtVEqKh3FEeUbToa1PtNBZf6G01cvEQ&r=WxtmI2HcpDF2j1UPw-tBSatMtcAHcEc-gP6FGr3XijQ&m=fr1RUDYTTiem9YAE7u99sskaxPHiNB54oK08WY93mS8&s=GY-4snvYRtttrYTbXRzbrHkN-gQ9t-xJIaXAodVLK8M&e=>.
    
    

_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev



[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux