Do I understand correctly, that you find the security of group 14 unacceptable and yet you left it enabled?
On 9/22/17, 2:01 PM, "openssh-unix-dev on behalf of Joseph S Testa II" <openssh-unix-dev-bounces+tim.broberg=servicenow.com@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of jtesta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 09/22/2017 03:22 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Thu 2017-09-21 18:12:44 -0400, Joseph S Testa II wrote:
>> I gotta say... having a fallback mechanism here seems pretty
>> strange. The entire point of the group exchange is to use a dynamic
>> group and not a static one.
>
> fwiw, i think dynamic groups for DHE key exchange is intrinsically
> problematic when there is any computational expense in validating the
> quality of the group parameters.
While some may agree with this, the fact remains that the current
implementation isn't working as expected. I'm interested in correcting
the behavior.
- Joe
_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.mindrot.org_mailman_listinfo_openssh-2Dunix-2Ddev&d=DwICAg&c=Zok6nrOF6Fe0JtVEqKh3FEeUbToa1PtNBZf6G01cvEQ&r=WxtmI2HcpDF2j1UPw-tBSatMtcAHcEc-gP6FGr3XijQ&m=fMI3Ao0UH8hvwBTkGGtmUAcxESVoEIlJMnu_UFC59Ps&s=PAGa24VxwyFcJP8QGus43lSGYkGU6OpQ0k0o2TCOejs&e=
_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
