Hi David, Yes, IMO it should be changed to `!= 0`. > A pointer can not be negative so it is either pointless or an error to check if it is not. That's not quite true, C standard doesn't force a valid pointer to be positive only. It is implementation dependent. All the more reason that the current code is fragile. _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
