On 27/05/15 23.38, Kasper Dupont wrote: > On 27/05/15 22.42, Ángel González wrote: > > Would you consider acceptable for the proxy to send an udp packet to the > > target server > > (eg. udp 514) informing it of the requested hostname it's forwarding? > > That's not a bad idea. It's an idea I hadn't thought about > before, but now I will. I'll have to think about what > advantages and disadvantages there are to this idea. So far > I can see some advantages in your proposal compared to the > ideas I have otherwise considered. > > Do you by any chance know if there is an RFC documenting the > format of the packets? I looked at http://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml For some reason it did not list any RFC for UDP port 514. But after a bit more search I found RFC 5424 and 5426. -- Kasper Dupont -- Rigtige mænd skriver deres egne backupprogrammer #define _(_)"d.%.4s%."_"2s" /* This is my email address */ char*_="@2kaspner"_()"%03"_("4s%.")"t\n";printf(_+11,_+6,_,12,_+2,_+7,_+6); _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
