On Fri, 2019-03-08 at 20:23 +0000, Phillips, Tony wrote:
> Testing throughput in cipher/MAC combinations (payload: 1400 bytes)
> RSA_ARCFOUR_128_SHA1 94.63 MB/sec
> RSA_ARCFOUR_128_MD5 96.69 MB/sec
> RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 0.66 GB/sec
> RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1 146.48 MB/sec
> RSA_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA1 48.80 MB/sec
>
> Testing throughput in cipher/MAC combinations (payload: 15360 bytes)
> RSA_ARCFOUR_128_SHA1 121.17 MB/sec
> RSA_ARCFOUR_128_MD5 106.72 MB/sec
> RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 1.05 GB/sec
> RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1 196.41 MB/sec
> RSA_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA1 53.76 MB/sec
>
I get this...
Testing throughput in cipher/MAC combinations (payload: 1400 bytes)
AES-128-GCM - TLS1.2 1.01 GB/sec
AES-128-GCM - TLS1.3 0.93 GB/sec
AES-128-CCM - TLS1.2 0.29 GB/sec
AES-128-CCM - TLS1.3 0.28 GB/sec
CHACHA20-POLY1305 - TLS1.2 0.21 GB/sec
CHACHA20-POLY1305 - TLS1.3 0.21 GB/sec
AES-128-CBC - TLS1.0 0.22 GB/sec
CAMELLIA-128-CBC - TLS1.0 66.12 MB/sec
That 0.22 GB/s for AES-128-CBC is fairly close to what I'm actually
seeing with netperf report 1620.11 Mbits per second, right? Or am I
getting too distracted by children who are objecting to me still
"working" at this time on a Friday night?....
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ openconnect-devel mailing list openconnect-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/openconnect-devel
