> On Sat, 2016-09-17 at 12:14 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > >> > > Can we ditch the first uint16 in payload, given that it is >> > > entirely >> > > redundant? Or am I misreading the spec to put it there in the >> > > first place, >> > > and the formal language is supposed to *include* what I called >> > > 'extlen' >> > According to the protocol tt has to be there. >> OK, thanks for confirming that. So that brings me to my next >> question, >> which is... given that the protocol is just a draft, should we >> propose >> *changing* it not to include that redundant length? > > As this was a copy of the TLS 1.3 PSK format I doubt we can have any > significant influence at it. Well, that'sounds just a draft too... :) -- dwmw2
