On Sat, 2016-09-17 at 12:14 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > Can we ditch the first uint16 in payload, given that it is > > > entirely > > > redundant? Or am I misreading the spec to put it there in the > > > first place, > > > and the formal language is supposed to *include* what I called > > > 'extlen' > > According to the protocol tt has to be there. > OK, thanks for confirming that. So that brings me to my next > question, > which is... given that the protocol is just a draft, should we > propose > *changing* it not to include that redundant length? As this was a copy of the TLS 1.3 PSK format I doubt we can have any significant influence at it.
