On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 19:53 -0400, Chaskiel Grundman wrote: >>> This works nicely in the NetworkManager UI, I hope? That one >>> *is* generic and can cope with arbitrary forms. >> Yes, the networkmanager UI works. > > Feel like fixing the text version of process_auth_form() to be similarly > generic, then? As I said, feel free to drop SecurID support; that > account for most of the horridness. Sure, I should be able to handle that.
