On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 18:35 -0400, Chaskiel Grundman wrote: > > I managed to get something that works, but it's a bit ugly, and I was > curious if anyone has ideas on how this scenario should be handled in > a > more generic fashion. Ew, yeah. This works nicely in the NetworkManager UI, I hope? That one *is* generic and can cope with arbitrary forms. The text version of process_auth_form() is an abomination. I suspect we should ditch the SecurID support, ditch the static buffers, and dynamically allocate buffers and use UI_add_input_string() for each required entry. -- dwmw2
