On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 10:49:22PM +0200, Enrico Mioso wrote:
> We are actually marking the volume as dirty. Reflect this in the message.
Again this should look like below. Maybe send patch series which contains
both of your patches. Mark it as v2.
We are actually marking the volume as dirty. Reflect this in the
message.
I have not strong opinion about this change so I let Konstantin decide.
> Signed-off-by: Enrico Mioso <mrkiko.rs@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c b/fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c
> index abe74dc9ce31..08802d7ca078 100644
> --- a/fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c
> +++ b/fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c
> @@ -933,7 +933,7 @@ int ntfs_set_state(struct ntfs_sb_info *sbi, enum NTFS_DIRTY_FLAGS dirty)
>
> switch (dirty) {
> case NTFS_DIRTY_ERROR:
> - ntfs_notice(sbi->sb, "Mark volume as dirty due to NTFS errors");
> + ntfs_notice(sbi->sb, "Marking volume as dirty due to NTFS errors");
> sbi->volume.real_dirty = true;
> fallthrough;
> case NTFS_DIRTY_DIRTY:
> --
> 2.33.1
>
>
