> Kernel 2.x is referenced often, and we're currently up to 6.x! That's one of the things I want to fix. Yeah this definitely seems more high priority currently. Is there anything outside people can do, to help the effort? > something a newbie wouldn't have a significant mental frame of reference for. You're probably right, come to think of it now maybe describing all of these details in kernelnewbies isn't appropriate. What my concern with documentation usually is, when it's hard to navigate or when fundamental information is missing or is spread outside of the documentation, it becomes really discouraging to engage with a project, especially for new people. I'll look into what's missing, if anything, at kernel.org regarding data types and attempt to send a patch for the docs there, when I have the time. > tldp.org > - In-depth information on Linux facts > - - Sadly, it seems to be aging as the latest Guides update is almost ten years old I didn't even know about this one. > kernelnewbies.org > - Help newbies find and use facts This makes sense, I guess I interpreted it more as a small summary of kernel.org, but helping people find the facts is the more practical solution. There's definitely no way to keep track of everything happening and updating it constantly, now that I think of it. _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
