>> Shouldn't there be a special type for doing this type of conversion? > That type is "unsigned long" :) Wouldn't "uintptr_t" be a more explicit type for storing pointer addresses as integers? It seems to me it has the advantage of expressing intent better for us human readers. See <linux/types.h>. Yes, it is currently defined as an "unsigned long." _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
