Re: Wouldn't Zig be more suitable than rust? In the Linux kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> The Zig compiler is compatible with C
So is Rust.

> Zig code is cleaner than Rust,
The standard library is a bit more readable, sure, but the overall 'cleanliness'
of either language is up for debate.

> and they are both equally secure.
If by 'secure' you mean safer, I believe Rust outshines Zig in memory safety.

Again, this is just from my research; I have only ever experimented with Rust so
I may be a bit biased.

--
- Joshua.

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]

  Powered by Linux