Re: Question regarding appropriate mailing list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 06:26:17PM +0200, Patryk wrote:
> Hi,
> What would be the most appropriate mailing list to ask about pmbus
> drivers and power management devices like ltc29**. I'm trying to
> bring-up some LTC devices using existing drivers and I've encountered
> some problems while reading e.g. temp1_max_alarm attribute (NACK
> returned from the target device). I've found what exact line of code
> introduced in 5.15.x kernel causes this problem but I'm not sure
> whether or not that line was added according to the pmbus
> specification expectations therefore the code is fine, but it may that
> it's the device that responds incorrectly and it's behaviour does not
> adhere to the pmbus specification.

Just run scripts/get_maintainer.pl on the files you are looking at and
it will tell you the mailing lists and people to cc: about them.

For example, if you have issues with the driver core functions in
drivers/usb/serial/visor.c, you can do:
	$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --file drivers/usb/serial/visor.c
	Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:USB SERIAL SUBSYSTEM)
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (supporter:USB SUBSYSTEM)
	linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:USB SERIAL SUBSYSTEM)
	linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list)

Hope this helps,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]

  Powered by Linux