On Sat, 09 Dec 2023 00:16:32 +0800, Dawei Li said: > Greetings! > (Although I am using the 2.6.34 version, I believe the question is generally > applicable to any kernel version.) That is, in general, a bad assumption when you are looking at kernel versions old enough that they count as digital archaeology.... [/usr/src/linux-next] git show v2.6.34 tag v2.6.34 Tagger: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun May 16 14:17:44 2010 -0700 [/usr/src/linux-next] git diff --shortstat v2.6.34..next-20231205 96965 files changed, 32056985 insertions(+), 7606202 deletions(-) Given that next-20231205 has just over 33 million lines of code, we're well into territory where there's a vanishing small percentage of code still remaining unchanged from 2010. And yes, that means that even basic functions schedule() and friends have been reworked in he past decade and a half.... _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
