On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 03:48:37AM +0100, FMDF wrote: > Unfortunately, there have been several attempts to state that Linux is > _not_ a free and open source kernel and that it contains proprietary binary > blobs. > > I'm asking for help to remove those fake information, mainly sponsored and > backed by the FSF and by the Linux libre project (or something like that). > > Can someone please provide reliable sources that I can use when reverting > the above-mentioned false information? Unfortunately, I cannot simply > revert them by just saying that the Linux Community won't ever accept non > GPLv2 complaint code. > > There is a strict rule that says "No original research": mostly everything > must be supported by links to third party reliable documentation (web, > books, and so on). > > Again, can someone please help? I doubt anyone really cares about the purity of wikipedia articles here. The best I can link you to is this FAQ entry: https://www.kernel.org/faq.html#i-heard-that-linux-ships-with-non-free-blobs -K _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
