Re: macro version of __func__ ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all!

On 03/08/2021 20:43, jim.cromie@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
[...]
> there are many uses of :
>   pr_debug("%s ...\n", __func__, ...)
> 
> I tried to do a preprocessor catenation to replace the runtime work,
> but that falls afoul of the def.

And that's a feature because preprocessor concatenation bloats the
kernels memory footprint massively.

[...]
> is there a kernel macro version that would allow this "optimization" ?

pr_*() are slow per se so optimizing there (apart from readability and
size od code+data) is wasted time.

MfG,
	Bernd
-- 
Bernd Petrovitsch                  Email : bernd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     There is NO CLOUD, just other people's computers. - FSFE
                     LUGA : http://www.luga.at

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]

  Powered by Linux