On Sat, 08 Aug 2020 12:48:08 -0500, cristian andres vargas gonzalez said: > Who have an empty body, Which is a reasonable thing to have, if the function doesn't do anything on a given architecture or configuration. > I understand that they are inside a conditional created by the preprocessor > directives and also that they are called in some parts of the code , but would > it really be necessary that when the directive is not true to leave the > function with the body empty, would it be a solution? I admit being confoozled here - would leaving a function with an empty body be a solution? Obviously it *would* be one, because the kernel currently does that. > Or is it just missing to eliminate those functions without a body? Feel free to try it and see what happens. :) (Make sure to try two different configs, one that includes the version that has the non-empty body, and one that tries to call the eliminated function without a body).
Attachment:
pgpCddkG5h_qH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
