Hi Guys, I lost about four hours chasing inaccurate messages from Apache. It turns out SElinux was denying access, so the EPERM was not really accurate. But Apache saw EPERM or EACCESS and logged a message related to Posix permissions. As far as I know Posix does not authorize use of EPERM or EACCESS for SElinux. That is, SElinux should not be hijacking the error code. I'm wondering why there is no error message for SElinux that would allow application to return a specific error when SElinux denies access to an object or operation. Why does SElinux not have its own error code? _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
