On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, valdis.kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 14:53:30 -0500, "Robert P. J. Day" said:
>
> > #define S_IRWXUGO (S_IRWXU|S_IRWXG|S_IRWXO)
> > #define S_IALLUGO (S_ISUID|S_ISGID|S_ISVTX|S_IRWXUGO)
> > #define S_IRUGO (S_IRUSR|S_IRGRP|S_IROTH)
> > #define S_IWUGO (S_IWUSR|S_IWGRP|S_IWOTH)
> > #define S_IXUGO (S_IXUSR|S_IXGRP|S_IXOTH)
>
> Can you give an actual non-contrived example of code where one of
> these would be preferable to inline coding the mask? And do you plan
> to include all the various combos? And why should that be done in
> the uapi headers, rather than glibc/musl/other_c_lib providing it?
... snip ...
i am not *defending* the above macros, simply pointing out that,
unlike all the other simpler macros that *are* exported via uapi,
these are left all by their lonesome in kernel space. i'm just
wondering if there's a reason for that.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca/dokuwiki
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
