On Tue, 03 Jul 2018 10:28:48 +0800, you said: > yes ! but there are days when people have to do a real-time work with no > delay in kernel space ,i think i can feed the dog > a percpu variable "nmi_touch" looks suspiciousï¼?thanksï¼? 1) The Linux kernel community convention is t use 'reply all' so that a copy goes back to the list, so that all may read, learn, and comment... 2) If you're hanging a CPU with something for long enough to trigger a watchdog event, you've *already* *broken* real-time processing on that CPU. Read that second sentence again, and repeat until it sinks in. If the watchdog is firing for a CPU because you've been running a tight loop on it for *that* long, *that CPU is by definition not able to do realtime in a Linux context*.
Attachment:
pgpZ7ae7Fad1e.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
