On Wed, 30 May 2018 13:25 -0400, valdis.kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > On Wed, 30 May 2018 10:16:13 -0700, Alexander Ivanov said: > > Hi All, > > What would be right place to ask questions about LSM? > > linux-security-module <linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > is where that development was done, but that list was last active in > May 2016 or so. > > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx would be another place to try. Will try these, thanks! > > What question do you have about it? There are a couple, actually :) First, theoretical, I suppose: what were the reasons to effectively disable dynamic loading of LSM ? Second, is there a way for two or more LSMs to co-exist? After inspecting security_module_enable() and register_security(), it doesn't seem possible, however yama does attempt to load itself? Am I missing something? thx! > _______________________________________________ > Kernelnewbies mailing list > Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies > Email had 1 attachment: > + Attachment1.2 > 1k (application/pgp-signature) -- Alexander Ivanov amivanov@xxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
