Re: Year 2038 time set problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/04/2018 09:35 PM, Alex Arvelaez wrote:
> If you don't need high availability, what's the problem with the occasional reboot?

I have a life, and its a chore to reboot the 3 boxes after every
upgrade.  It runs my phones, my TV, my house security, and my mail and
webserver and booting them all is a PIA.  If it is raining security
holes with every kernel upgrade, that is a big problem, and that is
before all these appliances.

Advice?  Who am I to give advice?  On the face of it, I would say they
need to harden the kernel base release.  But I am not qualified to give
anyone advice.  If a kernel can't be reasonably secure in a 2 year
period, as a consumer I can only be unhappy about it and a bit dismayed.
 But no one owes me anything.

-- 
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
http://www.mrbrklyn.com

DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir 2002
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software
http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/resources - Unpublished Archive
http://www.coinhangout.com - coins!
http://www.brooklyn-living.com

Being so tracked is for FARM ANIMALS and and extermination camps,
but incompatible with living as a free human being. -RI Safir 2013

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]

  Powered by Linux