On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 08:55:02PM -0400, valdis.kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:22:40 +1100, "Tobin C. Harding" said: > > Is it easier to review this change for correctness if it is three > > patches or one? > > > > TLDR; > > + struct wpa_key_t *key = &priv->wpa.key[index]; > > > > - memcpy(&priv->wpa.key[index].rx_seq[0], enc->rx_seq, IW_ENCODE_SEQ_MAX_SIZE); > > + memcpy(key->rx_seq, enc->rx_seq, IW_ENCODE_SEQ_MAX_SIZE); > > One patch for one thing. > > > Brief description of steps: > > 1. Add local pointer variable, defined to correct memory location. > > 2. Use newly defined local variable where suitable. > > 3. Remove unnecessary address operator (reasoning specified below). > > So, is this 3 things? Or one thing: > > "Simplify overly-complex first argument to memcpy()"? Thanks Valdis, very well explained. Tobin. _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
