Re: kernel development process question, patch review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

I think the list idea is no need for confusion, it is desirable to provide people with a new kernel newbies update to this list with a help and a quick solution to their problems.
This is like pre-kernel training.

TO and CC already come with the get_maintainer.pl script.

TO: Primary responsible
CC: development group + kernel mailing list
Kernelnewbies = kernelnewbies help

Regards,

Ozgur

> 21.02.2017, 04:44, "Tobin C. Harding" <me@xxxxxxxx>:
>>  If a reviewer makes a suggestion and one intends on making the change
>>  as suggested is it required (normal protocol) to reply stating that
>>  the you understand their suggestion and intend on implementing it or
>>  is this just noise. Should one simply re send the next version of the
>>  patch?
>>
>>  Continuing on this theme, should one add a Suggested-by: tag in the
>>  previous situation. Some where Documentation/process it states that no
>>  tag except the CC tag should be added without the authority of the
>>  person being named?
>>
>>  thanks,
>>  Tobin.

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux