On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:32 PM Blatinox <blatinox@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Amit,
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:30:06 +0000
Amit Kumar <free.amit.kumar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 4:51 PM Amit Kumar <free.amit.kumar@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > When I configure kernel like,
> > CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- ARCH=arm make omap2plus_defconfig
> > I get error as follows,
> > HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
> > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o
> > SHIPPED scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c
> > SHIPPED scripts/kconfig/zconf.lex.c
> > SHIPPED scripts/kconfig/zconf.hash.c
> > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.o
> > HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf
> > drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig:3:error: recursive dependency detected!
> > For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt
> > subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations"
> > drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig:3: symbol REMOTEPROC is selected by
> > QCOM_ADSP_PIL
> > For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt
> > subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations"
> > drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig:81: symbol QCOM_ADSP_PIL depends on REMOTEPROC
> > #
> > # configuration written to .config
> > #
> > I think Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-02 is applicable,
> > because REMOTEPROC is mentioned in depends on and select at different
> > places.
> >
> > I am using a branch based on next-20161117.
>
It has been fixed by commit cc7d54b05057 ("remoteproc: adsp-pil: fix
recursive dependency") available since next-20161122.
I am wondering one thing: is the dependency on REMOTEPROC necessary
for QCOM_ADSP_PIL symbol (and other symbols in the same file) even if
this symbol is defined inside an 'if REMOTEPROC' block ?
Yes it works in next-20161122. I'm in IST so I get next tree update the next day. If I want to create a linux-next tree and publish it on github publicly then what I need to do?
I think MAINTAINERS file may provide maintainers repos but there may be certain tasks to be performed which I as a newbie don't know.
I also want to do this because as push, pulling don't require authentication.
I'm obliged to mere guidance.
Currently I'm unable to discuss it in detail. As my knowledge of kernel grows I will start discussing any issue in detail.
Regards,
Amit Kumar
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
