On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:49:50 +0200, Bjørn Mork said: > 1) There should be *some* body text describing the patch, even for a very > basic change which is explained in full in subject. This goes first > in the body, separated from the tags with a single empty line. And to add to what he said: Explaining the *why* is better than the *how*. "Add Documentation/initest.txt" isn't that helpful - we can see from the diff that's what it does. "Add documentation explaining how to deal with the Frobnizz 3000's wonky interrupts" is a lot better. Similarly, "fix off-by-one error" is OK - but extending it to "fix off-by-one error that causes the wireless card to select the wrong channel" is a lot better. Sell us that patch - tell us *why* we want it in the kernel, and why we should spend time reviewing it....
Attachment:
pgpTXbFPl8iEL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
