On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 01:08:43PM +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote: > > I don't see anyone removing that line, perhaps you aren't looking at > > the patch properly in an email client? > > > > Leave it in there, it's good to have. > > There is way too much traffic in LMKL for me to read it with e-mail > client. This is why I'm using lkml.org. Here are just a few random > patches that were sent today: > > * https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/18/160 > * https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/18/155 > * https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/18/131 > * https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/18/123 > * https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/18/120 > * https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/18/98 > > No empty lines. Maybe in fact there are empty lines but lkml.org > removed them? Yup, it looks that way, the above patches all have that line in them when I look at the real emails. I recommend using a real email client when dealing with patches, allmost all web interfaces will mess them up. greg k-h _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
