On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 08:54:25PM +1300, vibnwis wrote: > > > > > > Saying that it is my fault for not incorporating the patch months > > ago was an over-simplification. > > It is you who admitted it is your fault. I just repeat what you said. > However, obviously you are not happy other people say it except yourself. > > > > > I was well aware of the TRACE_IRQFLAGS issue, and in fact, you could > > have been too, if you had done what is usually recommended and > > browsed the mailing list archives. > > > You are implying, i would get it resolved even without the patch, by doing > the recommended and browsed the mailing list archives. Yes. > > > > > Going to kernelnewbies was the good solution. Our resources are > > limited, we do not have time to teach every newbie you to > > enable/disable an option in the kernel configuration. > > > Again, you are implying, that without the patch i could get the issues > resolved. Going to kernelnewbies was to confirm my logic is correct. Yes, people are using xenomai without Jan's patch on the ARM platform: you have to get the CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS option disabled. > > > > > I have been very patient, but when someone seems not to follow > > simple answers he is given, he looses credit and answering him > > becomes less urgent. > > > Again, you blame me for not following the comments. You have been going > back and forth on this issues. However, the evidence shows that i did > follow and tried your comments, but not all of them are valid. And with > others helps and my persistent, I managed to resolved some of the issues. > Having said, I do not blame you for giving false answers. I do appreciate > the efforts. We must be looking at different evidences, because I re-read the thread again this morning, and clearly, at least for the cross-compilation issue (the --host thing), the way I read the evidence show that you have sent something like a dozen of mails of random tries and issues, which could have been avoided if you had passed the right argument to the --host option from the beginning. > > > > > > The problem is that it would seem you have not understood how a free > > software project support mailing list works. Our resources are > > limited, for my part, I answer during my work, so 5 or 6 mails a day > > is not a problem, more than that I have to stop answering and answer > > when coming back from work. > > > it is you who jumps to the conclusion that i do not understand how free > software project support mailing list works. it is you who thinks i am not > qualified in participating the mailing list. I have done my homework. i had > tried all i could before asking questions. I never expect clear solutions > out from mailing lists. > For your cases, i had stated my appreciation and gratefulness to your > assistance, didn't i? Yes you did. I am sorry for having sent this mail. This part was indeed a blatant lack of humility. I will stop answering now. My apologies. Regards. -- Gilles. https://click-hack.org _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
