Re: Safety in Kernel Development

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 21:58:15 +0800, æ??å?¬äº® said:

> Since I knew that Linux kernel didn't accept the pax/grsecurity , but wrote
> its own implement, and some linux developers do not have sense of security,
> I think linux security will be a problem in the future.

The fact that a specific security patch that is very invasive and comes with
some large tradeoffs was never submitted in a form suitable for merging is
*not* the same thing as kernel developers not having a sense of security.

Note that large sections of what used to be in the grsecurity patch *have*
been reworked, submitted, and accepted into the kernel.

Attachment: pgpPm3tbBqDnR.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux