Since I knew that Linux kernel didn't accept the pax/grsecurity , but wrote its own implement, and some linux developers do not have sense of security,
I think linux security will be a problem in the future.
- mudongliang
2015-08-18 21:45 GMT+08:00 Kenneth Adam Miller <kennethadammiller@xxxxxxxxx>:
Why? That's what the vast majority of the kernel is written in (besides assembler, but what I'm looking for isn't a way to write safe assembler). Plus, tons of people in the kernel development community *must* have some concern or interest in security. I don't care if the kernel is written in C, but I sure would like my kernel module to be safer. If I can get it I don't care what language it's in-it just has to work and *be secure*.On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, Kenneth Adam Miller wrote:
> Ok- so I know that C is the defacto standard for kernel
> development...
and that's probably where you should have stopped typing. :-)
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
