Re: Kernel contributions from organisations and individual privacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:39:47PM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > The only thing you have to agree with when contributing Linux kernel
> > code is the DCO, which can be found in the file
> > Documentation/SubmittingPatches, or here online:
> > 	http://developercertificate.org/
> > 
> 
> I didn't know that and looking at it, that is pretty flimsy.

Not at all, in fact, it's very strong.  A number of other projects also
use this same document (SAMBA, Docker, etc.), so it is well known and
proven to work.

> It is a good thing that up until know this hasn't bit them in the ass
> so far.  I might be all that is possible though because a CLA, to be
> really blanket, would require one having to go back to every
> contribution to date.

That's only if you wanted to do something crazy like relicense the work.
And even then, a CLA doesn't help you out, see all of the projects that
have undertaken this task and what they have done to enable it.  A CLA
doesn't do much there.

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux