Re: Fwd: Eudyptula challenge submissions (patch versus proof)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2015-02-02 13:03 MST, Tolga Ceylan <tolga.ceylan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I think due to my e-mail below, I was removed from the challenge.
>
> Or maybe it was due to the way I submitted the task; separate e-mail
> for proof and another kernel patch e-mail...
>
> I'm not sure if this is due to some script parsing some keywords in
> kernelnewbies list, but let this be a warning for the rest of you
> who are taking this challenge...
>
> I find this unnecessarily harsh especially when the system
> takes a very long time to process e-mails and when there's
> no outlet for process related questions such as mine below.
>
> All I wanted to find out was if proof should be in the patch
> itself or if it's OK to send separate e-mails.
>
> It really should be OK to ask for help for harmless submission related
> questions such as how to use thunderbird or git send-email.
>
> Cheers,
> Tolga

Did you try emailing little with the process questions? Process
questions should get answered there as well as questions regarding
the tasks. It might take some time to get a response, but eventually
you will.

Regards,
Jerry

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux