I think due to my e-mail below, I was removed from the challenge. Or maybe it was due to the way I submitted the task; separate e-mail for proof and another kernel patch e-mail... I'm not sure if this is due to some script parsing some keywords in kernelnewbies list, but let this be a warning for the rest of you who are taking this challenge... I find this unnecessarily harsh especially when the system takes a very long time to process e-mails and when there's no outlet for process related questions such as mine below. All I wanted to find out was if proof should be in the patch itself or if it's OK to send separate e-mails. It really should be OK to ask for help for harmless submission related questions such as how to use thunderbird or git send-email. Cheers, Tolga ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Tolga Ceylan <tolga.ceylan@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:23 AM Subject: Eudyptula challenge submissions (patch versus proof) To: kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Quick question about how to submit patches and proofs. Are separate emails OK with this? For example; 1) a "formal" kernel patch submitted via git send-email 2) proof e-mail submitted via replying to the original task email Or should the proof be in the git commit description itself? Cheers, Tolga _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
