Re: Submitted a first patch and no reply

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 12:37:15 -0800, shirish gajera said:

> That's hwy I just fix one warning.

That means "don't fix a warning about indentation *and* a  warning
about trailing blanks in the same patch".

Also, if you're fixing a style issue, you should actually *review* the
code, and make sure you fix the issue everywhere, *even if the other ones
didn't prompt a warning*.

It's interesting that the warning only popped on the one case where the
"/* looping version */" is on a separate line, not on the #else line.

Am cc'ing Joe Perches for that question. Joe - to get you up to speed,
checkpatch was run against drivers/staging/skein/skein_block.c, and it
flagged one definition of the macro R256, but not the other one, or the
two definitions each for R512 and R1024.  Any idea why?

Attachment: pgpiPvOnRlCgV.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux