On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 08:46:52PM -0800, John de la Garza wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 04:50:58PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 06:43:22PM -0500, John de la Garza wrote: > > > I assume it is a bad idea to depend on true being 1, right? I mean, I > > > should assume that true could be changed to any non 0 value in the future, > > > right? > > > > Why would that matter? Just always test for "true" and "false" and you > > will be fine. > > > > What if you need to store the value in a bitmap that needs > to be 1 or 0 so they can be shifted/anded in? Then you don't use a boolean if you are worried about it, come on, why is this even a discussion? _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
