On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 04:50:58PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 06:43:22PM -0500, John de la Garza wrote:
> > I assume it is a bad idea to depend on true being 1, right? I mean, I
> > should assume that true could be changed to any non 0 value in the future,
> > right?
>
> Why would that matter? Just always test for "true" and "false" and you
> will be fine.
>
What if you need to store the value in a bitmap that needs
to be 1 or 0 so they can be shifted/anded in?
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 06:43:22PM -0500, John de la Garza wrote:
> > I assume it is a bad idea to depend on true being 1, right? I mean, I
> > should assume that true could be changed to any non 0 value in the future,
> > right?
>
> Why would that matter? Just always test for "true" and "false" and you
> will be fine.
>
What if you need to store the value in a bitmap that needs
to be 1 or 0 so they can be shifted/anded in?
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
