On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Philipp Muhoray <philipp.muhoray@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am 2014-12-09 um 07:50 schrieb Avinash Patil: > > Hi Nick, > <snip> > Not that I have any say in this, but I feel like a ban should rather be > justified by someone's behavior instead of incorrect patches. I guess most > of us have send awful patches at some point, the question though is how we > dealt with it. I'm not saying the ban should be lifted, I'm just saying we > should communicate the right arguments for his ban (instead of blaming him > for commit messages he didn't even write). yes, we all have sent awful patches at some point of time , but on pointed out the mistakes in the patch , we have corrected them and, i suppose, almost all of us have taken care not to repeat that same mistakes again. But its not the case with Nick. You can search the old threads , in lkml , also here .. he has just continued with his way, without caring what has been told to him. If my opinion is counted, I will say NO. thanks sudip > > br, > phil > > _______________________________________________ > Kernelnewbies mailing list > Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies > _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
