On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:32 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 22:15:13 -0500, nick said: >> Greetings Fellow Developers, >> I have finally learned my lesson as you can tell from my newest patches being >> accepted or considered in good form. > > Right now,all I'm seeing in linux-next from you is 2 patches that > remove FIXME comments. Given your previous history of submitting > patches that failed to accurately analyze C program flow, And the > commit message on one of them: > > Remove FIXME comments about needing fault addresses to be returned. These > are propaagated from walk_addr_generic to gva_to_gpa and from there to > ops->read_std and ops->write_std. > > doesn't actually address the question of how to deal with fault addresses. > Yes, they're propagated back - but it doesn't directly address the question > of how a fault address is handled (in other words, you failed to show that > write_std actually does the right thing once it gets whatever we send back) > > I wouldn't hold my breath.... I submitted the patch. The maintainer changed the commit message not me. Nick _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
