On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 09:17:50 -0000, el_es said: > Maybe better to introduce a standard clear marker that > able people just respond with, to alikes of nick: > > REJECTED-by: Name <address@email.server> We already do something like this. You'll on occasion see 'Nacked-By: ...' go by when a kernel hacker wants to denote their displeasure with a given patch. It's up to the maintainer to decide how much credence to give to the Nack, based on the relative reputations of the person submitting the patch and the person nacking it, and any technical grounds given with the nack. So for instance, if Al Viro sticks a Nacked-By: on a submission, it's going to be *really* hard to get a maintainer to accept the patch, because Al has a very long history of almost always being right about such things.
Attachment:
pgpHvFHHOuPwE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
