On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:52:40 +0100, Hugo Mills said: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 09:44:05AM -0400, nick wrote: > > Thank you for your help, I'll study the code and see what I can do > > about it. Do you have any suggestions of how to fix this checkpatch > > warning? > > Ignore it. The checker has clearly triggered on a false positive -- > this is not a function call, and should not be held to that standard. > (Take a look at where the macro is actually used, to see what's going > on here). Move on to find something more interesting to fix. Am I the only one suspicious of the fact that Nick found one of the few false positives rather than one of the plentiful actual style problems?
Attachment:
pgpihXBAgqfSC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
