On Sat, 25 May 2013 15:52:59 +0530, "Lakshmipathi.G" said: > --001a11c35022e81b2f04dd884d9b > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Thanks for the replies. I'll explore suggestions given by Rami and Valdis. > > In the mean time,I think I found the lines(linux-3.9.3/Makefile) creating > overwriting the config file. > > # If .config is newer than include/config/auto.conf, someone tinkered > # with it and forgot to run make oldconfig. > # if auto.conf.cmd is missing then we are probably in a cleaned tree so > # we execute the config step to be sure to catch updated Kconfig files > include/config/%.conf: $(KCONFIG_CONFIG) include/config/auto.conf.cmd > $(Q)$(MAKE) -f $(srctree)/Makefile silentoldconfig > > when I comment out above lines the config file was not overwritten. Right. Exactly, Now think about *why* those lines are in the Makefile in the first place - it's to deal with people doing exactly what you're doing. The problem is that if you hand-edit one line of the .config, it doesn't in fact deal with *other* entries that need to be changed because there's a 'depends on' or 'select' that isn't fulfilled. And the fact that your hand-edited entry got removed shows that you didn't get it right - it got removed precisely *because* you didn't get all the depends correct. The reason the kernel does this is because if you're *lucky*, the kernel compile will simply fail with either a totally mystifying compile error about an undeclared variable or a structure member that doesn't exist, or when it tries to link vmlinux and it can't find a routine. If you're *unlucky*, it will compile, boot, and then die, corrupting your root filesystem as it goes. So yeah. Don't do that. ;)
Attachment:
pgpTXzpi0nEMZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies