(Thats an interesting pointer. I didnt know about cgroups freeze. Thanks.)
However, I'm trying to figure out how the kernel would go about doing it. i.e How the kernel, having a pointer to a task struct, goes about removing something from the runqueue. or bringing something from a TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE/STOPPED state back onto the runqueue.
I'm trying to figure this out from looking at the code, but am sort of getting lost.
I guess I can rephrase the question as, I dont really need to do it for any other purpose other than understanding how the kernel mechanisms will accomplish it. i.e Doing it from userspace using "kill" or cgroups freeze wont "uncover" this for me.
Hope my question is clearer,
Thanks for replies guys,
Amit
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Srivatsa Bhat <bhat.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi AmitOn Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Amit Gupta <gupta.v.amit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Kshemendra,I think I couldn't get my first question across clearly. My intent isn't to change do_fork()'s implementation. That wont work for precisely the reason you mentioned.(Infact everything after the init process would end up blocked).My question was more to explore if an existing running process can be explicitly taken off the runqueue once we have a pointer to its task_struct.If you simply want to stop a running process and resume it at your will,you don't need to write any kernel code at all. Simply use the cgroupfreezer functionality from userspace. You can find more details inDocumentation/cgroups/freezer-subsystem.txt in the kernel sources.Regards,Srivatsa S. Bhat
Amit Gupta
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
