On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Adam Lee <adam8157@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:04:06AM +0200, Christophe Lucas wrote: >> Le 25/10/2011 09:46, Javier Martinez Canillas a écrit : >> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:36 AM, bob<ilikepie420@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> He's probably doing os dev and wants something simple to learn. Stick with >> >> 0.01 as 0.02 source is lost. Sad face. >> > >> > Yes I know, but I recommend either use a newer kernel or use an >> > operating system that was written for teaching like: >> > >> > http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/6.828/2011/xv6.html >> > >> > I don't want to imagine how hard could be compiling a 0.01 kernel with >> > GCC 4.5 and find a rootfs that is suitable for it. >> >> Hello, >> >> I know it is in french(sorry), but you can also use : >> >> http://sos.enix.org/fr/PagePrincipale >> http://sos.enix.org/fr/SOSDownload#TOC_0_2_25 >> >> Which is a articles series published in a linux magazin in France. It >> becomes from boot to block-devices. >> > > I found this: http://mirrors.kernel.org/oldlinux/Linux.old/kernel/ > > 0.00/ 20-Jan-2005 07:06 > 0.1x/ 04-May-2004 14:09 > 0.95/ 20-Mar-2004 13:10 > 0.96/ 20-Jan-2004 11:46 > 0.97/ 20-Jan-2004 11:46 > 0.98/ 20-Jan-2004 11:46 > 0.99/ 20-Jan-2004 11:46 > 1.00/ 20-Jan-2004 11:46 > Historic/ 20-Mar-2003 22:38 > > 0.02 lost. If you wanna start from oldlinux, 0.11 will be a good choice, > and there is a book about this: http://mirrors.kernel.org/oldlinux/ Try oskit as it is good for learning: http://www.cs.utah.edu/flux/oskit/ Take care. -- Shahbaz Khan _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
