On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:04:06AM +0200, Christophe Lucas wrote: > Le 25/10/2011 09:46, Javier Martinez Canillas a écrit : > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:36 AM, bob<ilikepie420@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> He's probably doing os dev and wants something simple to learn. Stick with > >> 0.01 as 0.02 source is lost. Sad face. > > > > Yes I know, but I recommend either use a newer kernel or use an > > operating system that was written for teaching like: > > > > http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/6.828/2011/xv6.html > > > > I don't want to imagine how hard could be compiling a 0.01 kernel with > > GCC 4.5 and find a rootfs that is suitable for it. > > Hello, > > I know it is in french(sorry), but you can also use : > > http://sos.enix.org/fr/PagePrincipale > http://sos.enix.org/fr/SOSDownload#TOC_0_2_25 > > Which is a articles series published in a linux magazin in France. It > becomes from boot to block-devices. > I found this: http://mirrors.kernel.org/oldlinux/Linux.old/kernel/ 0.00/ 20-Jan-2005 07:06 0.1x/ 04-May-2004 14:09 0.95/ 20-Mar-2004 13:10 0.96/ 20-Jan-2004 11:46 0.97/ 20-Jan-2004 11:46 0.98/ 20-Jan-2004 11:46 0.99/ 20-Jan-2004 11:46 1.00/ 20-Jan-2004 11:46 Historic/ 20-Mar-2003 22:38 0.02 lost. If you wanna start from oldlinux, 0.11 will be a good choice, and there is a book about this: http://mirrors.kernel.org/oldlinux/ -- Regards, Adam Lee -------------------------------------------------- E-mail: adam8157@xxxxxxxxx Website: http://www.adam8157.info -------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
