Re: Low on disk space after compiling new kernel.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Dexter Haslem <dexter.haslem@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12/20/2010 2:15 AM, Rishi Agrawal wrote:

Thanks a ton ... I will try it.


On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Mulyadi Santosa
<mulyadi.santosa@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:mulyadi.santosa@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

   Hi Rishi....

   On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 13:48, Rishi Agrawal
   <rishi.b.agrawal@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:rishi.b.agrawal@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
    > Hi All,
    >
    > I installed the kernel 2.6.36 into my Fedora 12 system.
    >
    > I am now low on disk space.
    >
    > [root@rishi-desktop kernels]# du -sh linux-2.6.36/
    > 4.4G    linux-2.6.36/

   Hm, I think that's rather big....here after compilation (of course, my
   .config is likely different than yours), 2.6.36 takes approximately
   1.7 GiB
    >
    > It shows that the new compiled kernel is taking around 4.4GB.

   Together with the object files during linking stage, I believe :)

    > I wanted to free some of the space occupied by the compiled code. I
    > understand that the /lib/modules/2.6.36 directory can't be
   deleted as it
    > contains the compiled modules.

   Yup...

    > I wanted to delete the files in /usr/src/kernel/2.6.36, without
   effecting my
    > newly installed kernel.
    >
    > -> Can I delete them?

   AFAIK, /lib/modules/<version>/build is symlink-ed to that source code
   dir, so IMHO don't delete it..

    > -> What is the best way to delete them, I want to keep the source
   files?

   I think the best way here is to do "make clean" and then followed by
   "make modules_prepare". That way, your kernel source dir is build with
   files enough to compile external modules whenever needed, but not too
   bloated

   --
   regards,

   Mulyadi Santosa
   Freelance Linux trainer and consultant

   blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com <http://the-hydra.blogspot.com>
   training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com
   <http://mulyaditraining.blogspot.com>




--
Regards,
Rishi Agrawal



_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

Hi Rishi,

One other thing that might help is not compiling a debug build if you dont need it. Debug objects are much bigger of course. If you're ending up at 4.4GB it sounds like a build with debugging on.

--
-Dexter Haslem

yes I have some debugging options set.

The current usage (after make clean and modules_prepare ) is around 867M.

Thanks a lot...


--
Regards,
Rishi Agrawal

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux