Re: filesystem or database??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 3:58 PM, mohit verma <mohit89mlnc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> hello,
> when we install any package (like  in  ubuntu) ,at end the terminal shows
> "reading database" . the idea i got by my friend is that package manager
> uses this database (like .deb or rpm).
> but my question is : everything in linux is a file so it(database or files

Everything in Linux is a file breaks down at the networking stack.
This is one location where the whole system is not abstracted through
the filesystem.

> that it contains) must be placed somewhere in the  filesystem.what is the
> difference  if i say that package manager accesses nothing but the
> filesystem ( obviously a part of it) and database of a system( computer ) is
> nothing but  the filesystem (part of it ) itself  ?
> i mean: what differs between these two that imposes us to name them
> differently?

It is possible to run a database not on a filesystem, but rather on a
raw partition without any filesystem.  That is not the case with the
package manager though.

--
John

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux