Re: problem with get_curretn() function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:54 AM, mohit verma <mohit89mlnc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> thank you daniel
> one more thing....
> in the link:
> http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ/current
> ti variable is declared and without assigning it any value it is use to
> calculate the address of thread_info( or as u said address of task_struct in
> newer kernels) .our intention is to mask left most 13 bits to get base
> address of structure. but it does not mean that any of the garbage value(
> like ti)
> can be used to calculate this.
> i know i am skipping something silly.
> but does ti (garbage) make any sense here?

If you take a closer look you'll notice that the value of ti is not used, but
only it's address (which is a kernel stack address).

Please when replying, use Reply To All option :).

thanks,
Daniel.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux