Re: Basic doubt regarding block layer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



sudheer wrote
>>> B. will the process be returned after scheduling the writing (say
>>> after passing the data to the elevator)? If this case is true, how
>>> would the process ensure that the data has been actually written on to
>>> the block device?

To ensure the data hit the disk you need to pass O_SYNC flag while opening the file.
see open(2m).

regards,
ajit jain

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Michael Blizek <michi1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi!

On 09:02 Wed 30 Jun     , Sudheer wrote:
...
> Thanks for the comments. In this case, is there any difference in
> invoking 'write' with O_NONBLOCK flag set and without O_NONBLOCK?.
>
> >From the man page it looks like that the O_NONBLOCK is used to
> determine whether or not to block the process if it tries to access a
> 'locked' region. Means it doesn't have any effect in 'write' system
> call?

No, O_NONBLOCK does not have any effect when the data hits the disks, it only
defines the behaviour when the kernel buffers are full. See my other reply on
kernelnewbies.

       -Michi
--
programing a layer 3+4 network protocol for mesh networks
see http://michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux